Did Rudyard Kipling's works generally portray the British Empire as a positive influence?

Rudyard Kipling was a really interesting figure in British literary history, especially when we think about the British Empire. He lived from 1865 to 1936, a time when the Empire was at its peak. Kipling is famous for his poems and stories set in places like India, which was then part of the British Empire. Now, here's the thing: Kipling's works often showed the Empire as a positive thing, a force that brought civilization and order to other parts of the world. Think of poems like "The White Man's Burden," which, although controversial today, reflects this idea of Britain having a duty to civilize other nations. While his views are definitely debated now, back then, many people shared his perspective. So, when we consider his overall body of work and the context of the time he was writing, it's generally true that Kipling portrayed the British Empire as a positive influence. It's important to remember that this is just one perspective on a complex historical period, and many people at the time and since have disagreed with this view.
Kipling, a Nobel laureate, often depicted the Empire as a 'force for good' in his poems and novels set in India and the UK.