Which statement is correct regarding life peers?

Okay, let's break down how life peers get their seats in the House of Lords. To understand this, it's helpful to think about the traditional roles of the Prime Minister and the Monarch. The Prime Minister is the head of the government and is responsible for the day-to-day running of the country. They're the one with the political mandate from the people. The Monarch, while the head of state, acts on the advice of the government. So, when it comes to appointing life peers – individuals who are given a seat in the House of Lords for their lifetime in recognition of their achievements – the process reflects this dynamic. The Prime Minister recommends individuals to the Monarch, and the Monarch then formally appoints them. It's a subtle but important distinction. The Prime Minister effectively chooses who becomes a life peer, but the appointment is made in the name of the Monarch, upholding the constitutional conventions of the UK. A common misconception is that the Monarch has more direct power in this process, but in reality, they act on the advice of the elected government.